Sunday, November 9, 2014

Nightcrawler (Quick Review)

While an actor can make or break a film’s effectiveness, occasionally the actor exclusively creates the film’s success.  Nightcrawler is of the latter, working because of Jake Gyllenhaal’s performance.  Without Jake Gyllenhaal there is no film, no acclaim, no effectiveness.  If there’s a reason for recommending Nightcrawler, it’s for Gyllenhaal’s frighteningly brilliant performance. 

From Donnie Darko to Prisoners I've always enjoyed his performances, considering Gyllenhaal an exceptional actor; his role as Louis Bloom simply confirms how right I am.  Louis is the first role where Gyllenhaal shed’s all semblance of charm and attraction, becoming a character who is both physically and personally repulsive.  Louis is pure and simply a vile human being, the scummiest of scum who represents the worst of media and paparazzi; he also happens to be our protagonist.  Physically Louis has a scrawny, almost malnourished look which shows best in his boney face and greasy hair; giving him an appropriate sleazy salesman look.  Louis hates people, yet hides it under a façade of compliments and smooth talking; he’s the kind of guy who’d cheerfully shake your hand while simultaneously stabbing you in the back.  Once a character gets to know him however, the mask becomes apparent; revealing an ambitious, egotistical and apathetic man caring only for personal achievement (making him perfect for the freelance world of crime journalism).  Louis is deceptively intelligent however, which when combined with ambition and lack of empathy, makes him particularly dangerous.  When Louis wants something, he gets it, and god help anyone (enemy or ally) who stands in his way of success. 

The many sins of his include blackmailing a lady into having sex, critically injuring his competition, leaving a wounded man to die, involving innocent citizens in a deadly gun fight, getting cops killed in an avoidable conflict, and purposely killing off an ally who got the better of a negotiation (all without a shed of guilt).  If you can’t tell by the list of offenses, Nightcrawler is not a pleasant film to watch.  Gyllenhaal’s performance may be incredible, but by the last 20 minutes viewers may have enough of Louis’ devious, scot-free actions.  Such unpleasantness will vary for those watching the film; some may find it refreshing while others turned away.  Unfortunately, Nightcrawler’s plot is fairly standard, including the ending which I predicted around half way through.  And while I’m fine with reusing ideas, the film’s issues with logic lapses alongside character inconsistencies makes its predictable nature stand out.  Gyllenhaal’s performance is the savior of Nightcrawler, taking the film’s substandard issues and shoving them out the limelight in favor of Louis’ deliciously malicious, sociopathic, stepford smiler role.  With one of Gyllenhaal’s best performances yet, Nightcrawler is a film worthy of getting a viewing chance to impress.

Very Popular Posts