Pages

Monday, March 28, 2016

Allegiant (Film Review)

What a bland, generic mess.

I miss the days where I could praise Shailene Woodley for her exceptional performances.  Remember when she costarred with Miles Teller in The Spectacular Now—delivering a startlingly outstanding performance as a high school teen?  Or when she and Ansel Elgort starred in the beautifully tragic romance The Fault in Our Stars?  I bring these films up because the Divergent series constantly reminds me of them, having all three actors appear as major characters.  Yet here there’s no enthusiastic praise, only utter disappointment towards their minimal acting effort—though I hardly blame them with the script they’re given.

Allegiant ends the Divergent series on a low point…except it doesn’t even do that since—as my wife informed me when leaving the theater—there is, in fact, one more film remaining (the producers renaming it Ascendant to avoid the generic Part 1/Part 2 titling which has plagued young adult film finales).  Allegiant is similar to The Scorch Trials had all the fun, adventure, and life been sucked out of it.  The film could have been passable entertainment—much like Insurgent—had there been a considerable amount of action; yet strangely enough, the film is dishearteningly low on action sequences.  Where it stands, Allegiant’s most enjoyable aspects are Four’s (Theo James) facial expressions (his deadpan mugging really amuses me for some reason) and Peter’s (Miles Teller) snarky comments.  Peter really is a lovable scumbag, in fact, he’s the most engaging character throughout the film.  From its heroes, to villains, to Tris (Shailene Woodley) herself, everyone has become entirely forgettable.  Tris is even given reverse character development, appearing more foolish and naïve than in previous installments.

It’s gotten to the point where I don’t care who lives or dies, who succeeds or fails.  I don’t care if Chicago falls, and I don’t care if Tris saves the world—which is an honest shame since I really did care when the series began.  A supporting ally of Tris dies in the film’s opening and I could not remember who she was (she seemed like an important character, though I can’t recall if that’s true).  Her death was entirely cliché as well, getting shot just as she sees the outside world and Tris remarks, “We made it!”  Too be fair, everything in Allegiant is clichéd: from its stereotypical, big bad leaders, to the “plot twists”, to the big, damn speeches given, “You saved the city, help me save the world.”  The plot feels rushed despite being a secret part-1, the manipulative, dystopian government does and says everything possibly wrong to get Tris and crew to trust them, all the leaders act like absolute imbeciles and make so many dumb, rash decisions, and why the hell does the super-advanced, dystopian, “big brother is watching you” government NOT have freaking security cameras!?

From what I read about Insurgent’s adaptation butchering, I’m not sure how much of Allegiant’s film mess is the book’s fault.  There are definitely aspects in the film I can imagine being better explained in the book, such as the “pure vs damaged” ideology, which I did not at all understand (the film makes it sound really stupid).  The Divergent Series seems to have gone off-rails from which there is no return.  I enjoyed the first film, faults withstanding, and while the second was messy, its entertaining aspects kept me hanging on by a thread.  Allegiant has severed said thread: it’s bland, lifeless, clichéd, and an absolute mess.  I’ve had all I can take from this series, and while I may view Ascendant on DVD (simply to conclude the series), I certainly won’t be seeing it in theaters.